Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 811 N.W.2d 136
  • 2012 WL 254471
  • 2012 Minn. App. LEXIS 12

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that this court reviews admission of evidence under Minn. R. Evid. 403 for abuse of discretion
  • addressing only the Fifth Amendment when appellant mentioned article I, section 7, of the Minnesota Constitution in his brief, but raised only Fifth-Amendment arguments
  • addressing only Fifth Amendment when appellant mentioned article I, section 7, of Minnesota Constitution in his brief but based arguments only on Fifth Amendment
  • “Under Minnesota law, a delay of more than 60 days from the date of the speedy-trial demand is presumptively prejudicial, triggering review of the remaining three factors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bjorkman, Collins, Schellhas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.