Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2/25/1988
State v. Peck
Citations
- 422 N.W.2d 160
- 143 Wis. 2d 624
- 1988 Wisc. App. LEXIS 80
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding marijuana possession not necessarily included in crime of attempting to introduce marijuana into federal correctional facility
- preservation of public health and safety is compelling interest and overrides free exercise in using marijuana as religious sacrament
- \observations from outside the curtilage of activities within are not generally interdicted by the Constitution\
- “Possession ... is not an element of the offense of manufacturing a controlled substance under [the Wisconsin statute].”
- state peyote exemption upheld because of unique historic and cultural attributes of Native Americans
- “Possession, however, is not an element of the offense of manufacturing a controlled substance.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gartzke, Dykman, Eich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. TuckerWisconsin Supreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 47×
- People v. PeckCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-12-30· cited 42×
- People of Michigan v. Richard Allen BahamMichigan Court of Appeals· 2017-09-12· cited 40×
- State v. BalzerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-04-17· cited 37×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-07-21· cited 24×
- Rook v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-05-16· cited 18×
- State v. McKenzieCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1989-07-26· cited 8×
- McBride v. Shawnee County, Kansas Court ServicesD. Kansas· 1999-09-17· cited 2×
- State v. BICKLECourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-11-17· cited 2×
- State v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1998-02-27· cited 1×
- State v. Andy J. ParisiWisconsin Supreme Court· 2016-02-24
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court· 1972-05-15· cited 3,250×
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court· 1963-06-17· cited 2,650×
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 1,923×
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 1,672×
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 931×
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court· 1982-02-23· cited 834×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1980-04-24· cited 175×
- United States v. RushFirst Circuit· 1984-06-27· cited 140×
- United States v. Miguel Angel TabordaSecond Circuit· 1980-11-24· cited 117×
- Timothy Leary v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1967-09-29· cited 91×
- United States v. David T. Lace, Roger R. Ducharme, Gary D. Butts, Patricia Eckman, and Glenn PollackSecond Circuit· 1982-01-05· cited 91×
- Cornelius Fullbright v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1968-04-30· cited 82×
- United States v. Clifton Ray MiddletonEleventh Circuit· 1982-11-01· cited 74×
- United States v. KuchDistrict of Columbia· 1968-07-01· cited 73×
- State v. GrawienCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1985-03-07· cited 63×
- State v. KellyIdaho Court of Appeals· 1984-01-31· cited 59×
- United States v. Claude Bishop MintonFourth Circuit· 1973-11-30· cited 43×
- State v. OlsenSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-01-20· cited 39×
- National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) v. BellDistrict of Columbia· 1980-02-11· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.