Wisconsin Supreme Court· 3/5/2003
State v. Tucker
Citations
- 2003 WI 12
- 657 N.W.2d 374
- 259 Wis. 2d 484
- 2003 Wisc. LEXIS 12
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding, based upon anonymous jury analysis, that trial court’s failure to determine whether jury needed protection or to take precautionary measures to minimize prejudice to defendant was nevertheless harmless error due to defendant’s confession
- applying anonymous jury analysis where both parties had access to the jurors' names, but the jurors were referred to only by numbers in open court
- finding trial court’s failure to provide justification for semi-anonymous jury was error
- court erred in adopting practice of empanelling anonymous juries in all drug cases without individualized determination of need
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bablitch, Abrahamson, Bradley, Sykes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. HanksMichigan Court of Appeals· 2007-10-11· cited 131×
- State v. IvyTennessee Supreme Court· 2006-02-28· cited 74×
- State v. Gary M.B.Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2004-03-26· cited 62×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-09-09· cited 31×
- State v. CarlsonWisconsin Supreme Court· 2003-05-13· cited 24×
- Major v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-09-28· cited 22×
- People v. FloresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2017-07-05· cited 22×
- People v. RoblesColorado Court of Appeals· 2011-03-31· cited 21×
- State v. SundbergOregon Supreme Court· 2011-02-17· cited 17×
- Perez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2013-04-08· cited 16×
- People v. GoberdhanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2025-08-07· cited 2×
- State of Tennessee v. David IvyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2004-12-30
- State v. SarauerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2004-07-29
- State v. MatosCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2004-03-03
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 2,653×
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 2,431×
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 2,166×
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 1,807×
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court· 1986-01-14· cited 1,638×
- State v. SullivanWisconsin Supreme Court· 1998-03-25· cited 360×
- United States v. DardenEighth Circuit· 1995-11-22· cited 301×
- United States v. ThomasSecond Circuit· 1985-03-11· cited 299×
- United States v. BarnesSecond Circuit· 1979-04-23· cited 296×
- United States v. Allan RossEleventh Circuit· 1994-10-11· cited 221×
- State v. PulizzanoWisconsin Supreme Court· 1990-06-12· cited 196×
- United States v. KroutFifth Circuit· 1995-09-28· cited 181×
- United States v. Bahman Mansoori, Mark Cox, Mohammad Mansoori, Kenneth Choice, and Terry YoungSeventh Circuit· 2002-10-16· cited 143×
- United States v. Robert P. Deluca, Sr., United States of America v. Gerard T. Ouimette, United States of America v. Gerard T. OuimetteFirst Circuit· 1998-04-14· cited 125×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.