· 2/11/1980
National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) v. Bell
Citations
- 488 F. Supp. 123
- 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12525
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Given the continuing debate over marijuana, this court must defer to the legislature’s judgments on disputed factual issues.”
- “Even assuming, arguendo, that marijuar na does not fall within a literal reading of Schedule I, the classification still is rational. Placing marijuana in Schedule I furthered the regulatory purposes of Congress. The statutory criteria of section 812(b)(1
- discussing legislative history of Controlled Substances Act
- marijuana's classification withstood due process challenge
- marijuana’s classification withstood due process challenge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tamm, Robinson, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.