Skip to main content
· 2/11/1980

National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) v. Bell

Citations

  • 488 F. Supp. 123
  • 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Given the continuing debate over marijuana, this court must defer to the legislature’s judgments on disputed factual issues.”
  • “Even assuming, arguendo, that marijuar na does not fall within a literal reading of Schedule I, the classification still is rational. Placing marijuana in Schedule I furthered the regulatory purposes of Congress. The statutory criteria of section 812(b)(1
  • discussing legislative history of Controlled Substances Act
  • marijuana's classification withstood due process challenge
  • marijuana’s classification withstood due process challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tamm, Robinson, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.