Supreme Court of Iowa· 1/20/1982
State v. Olsen
Citations
- 315 N.W.2d 1
- 1982 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1292
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the State of Iowa had a compelling interest sufficient to override Olsen’s claim that possession of marijuana was permissible as a free exercise of his religion
- sustaining admissibility of expert testimony that quantity of marijuana found in defendant’s possession could be diluted and profitably distributed to others
- finding admissible testimony that the evidence found on the defendant “fit into the method of operation of a person who was selling drugs for profit”
- state has compelling interest in regulating use of marijuana which outweighs religious free exercise
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Legrand, Harris, McCormick, Allbee, Larson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State of Iowa v. Jesse Michael GaskinsSupreme Court of Iowa· 2015-06-30· cited 131×
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-07-26· cited 122×
- State v. BerrySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-05-04· cited 105×
- Carl Eric Olsen v. Drug Enforcement Administration, Carl Eric Olsen v. John Lawn, Administrator, Drug Enforcement AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 1989-06-20· cited 57×
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Iowa· 2006-10-13· cited 44×
- People v. PeckCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-12-30· cited 42×
- State v. BalzerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-04-17· cited 37×
- State v. HollandSupreme Court of Iowa· 1986-06-18· cited 27×
- State v. PeckCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1988-02-25· cited 25×
- PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MID-IOWA. v. MakiSupreme Court of Iowa· 1991-12-24· cited 21×
- State v. LordSupreme Court of Iowa· 1983-12-21· cited 16×
- State v. DinkinsCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 1996-06-27· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. CarringtonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-08-06· cited 13×
- State v. PerezNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1987-06-30· cited 13×
- State v. VeseyCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 1991-12-31· cited 12×
- State v. OdomNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-06-10· cited 10×
- State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Iowa· 1986-02-19· cited 7×
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 1994-02-25· cited 4×
- Gauvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-12-18· cited 4×
- State v. DerifieldCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 1991-01-29· cited 3×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1940-05-20· cited 3,669×
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 3,538×
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 3,483×
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court· 1972-05-15· cited 3,250×
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court· 1963-06-17· cited 2,650×
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 2,501×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-05· cited 1,768×
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,484×
- Robbins v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 503×
- Fowler v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court· 1953-03-09· cited 251×
- Jerry Teterud v. Kevin J. Burns, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Director of the Department of Social Services for the State of IowaEighth Circuit· 1975-09-04· cited 104×
- United States v. KuchDistrict of Columbia· 1968-07-01· cited 73×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-12-18· cited 67×
- State v. OlsenSupreme Court of Iowa· 1980-06-18· cited 64×
- State v. HortonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1975-06-25· cited 55×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.