Abdul Peay v. Carl Ajello, Johanna Colon, C/o William O'COnnOr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Connecticut probation officers are “entitled to absolute immunity in suits for damages arising out of their preparation and submission of presentence reports”
• “[P]robation officers are also entitled to absolute immunity in suits for damages arising out of their preparation and submission of presentence reports.”
• absolute immunity barred claim that prosecutor conspired to fabricate evidence, withhold exculpatory evidence, and intimidate defendant into accepting plea
• “allegations of extensive conspiratorial misconduct between defense counsel and the prosecution would render the [plaintiff’s] convictions invalid if they were proved” and, thus, are barred by Heck
• “allegations of extensive conspiratorial misconduct between defense counsel and the prosecution would render the [plaintiff’s] convictions invalid if they were proved” and, thus, are barred by Heck
• “allegations of extensive conspiratorial misconduct between defense counsel and the prosecution would render the [plaintiff’s] convictions invalid if they were proved” and, thus, are barred by Heck

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).