Supreme Court of Connecticut· 3/16/2010

State v. Ouellette

Citations

989 A.2d 1048
295 Conn. 173
2010 Conn. LEXIS 76

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

directing trial courts to inquire into nature of plea agreements and upholding judgment even though trial court had failed to so inquire
noting that whether defendant established necessary factual predicate to his claim that state’s attorney did, in fact, promise to dismiss charges against witness as part of plea agreement ‘‘is a fact based claim to be determined by the trial court, subject only to review for clear error’’
reformulating certified question to conform to issue actually presented and decided in appeal
conducting Golding review of Brady claim that was not made at trial
‘‘[o]nly through complete and candid disclosure of a witness’ interest can the jury accurately gauge the credibility of the testi- mony proffered’’
prerequisite of any Brady , Napue , and Giglio claim is existence of undisclosed agreement or understanding between cooperating witness and state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella, McLachlan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.