Supreme Court of Missouri· 11/22/1994

State v. Parker

Citations

886 S.W.2d 908
1994 WL 584070

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding defendant's statement that he \ought to talk to an attorney\ was not unambiguous invocation
concluding defendant's statement that he \ought to talk to an attorney\ was not unambiguous invocation
observing, in the context of the State’s alleged failure to timely disclose evidence under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 25.03, that “the proper remedy was continuance”
photographs of prior crimes were admissible at capital sentencing hearing because they were used to help the jury understand the circumstances of the prior crimes
“Neither [defendant’s] refusal to sign the waiver form, nor his statement that he ‘ought’ to talk to a lawyer, unambiguously invoked his right to counsel.”
jury recommended death sentence after mental health expert testified to defendant’s borderline personality disorder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

178 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.