Skip to main content

State v. Nunley

Citations

  • 923 S.W.2d 911
  • 1996 WL 283978

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that judge was not required to recuse where “[t]here [was] no evidence other than defendant’s assertion ‘secret’ meetings ... occurred” to discuss judge’s reappointment to a case
  • holding it was reasonable trial strategy for counsel to have determined that sentencing by the court was preferred to sentencing by a jury
  • holding it was reasonable trial strategy for counsel to have determined that sentencing by the court was preferable to sentencing by a jury
  • holding the authority does not include disqualifying other judges from hearing a certain case
  • holding the authority does not include disqualifying other judges from hearing a certain case
  • finding trial counsel reasonably concluded court sentencing was preferential to jury sentencing and the defendant did not have a statutory right at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benton, Covington, Hoff, Holstein, Kennedy, Limbaugh, Price, Robertson, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

84 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.