Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 12/4/2009
State v. Liverman
Citations
- 687 S.E.2d 70
- 386 S.C. 223
- 2009 S.C. App. LEXIS 507
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- State’s trial theory was that two teardrop tattoos were obtained by defendant after two murders for which he was on trial; defendant failed to argue that the evidence might be construed as suggesting earlier murders, and thereby as propensity evidence, until appeal
- State's trial theory was that two teardrop tattoos were obtained by defendant after two murders for which he was on trial; defendant failed to argue that the evidence might be construed as suggesting earlier murders, and thereby as propensity evidence, until appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huff, Thomas, Pieper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LivermanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-06-06· cited 39×
- State v. DeLeonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-12-23· cited 15×
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-12-14· cited 5×
- State v. BroadnaxCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-01-09· cited 2×
- State of Washington v. Ricardo Juarez DeleonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-12-23
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-23· cited 334×
- State v. PaganSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-06-19· cited 319×
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-01-27· cited 73×
- State v. PageCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-04-03· cited 36×
- State v. CheathamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-25· cited 21×
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-11-21· cited 18×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-02-06· cited 6×
- State v. McLeodSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-05-09· cited 4×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-28· cited 3×
- In the Interest of Robert D.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-04-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.