Skip to main content

State v. Dunlap

Citations

  • 579 S.E.2d 318
  • 353 S.C. 539
  • 2003 S.C. LEXIS 71

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that when a prior crime is similar to the one for which the defendant is being tried, the danger of unfair prejudice to the defendant from impeachment by the prior offense weighs against its admission
  • holding defense counsel’s opening statement “opened the door to the introduction of evidence rebutting the contention that [defendant] was merely an addict”
  • finding that evidence of prior drug convictions was properly allowed to rebut false impression made by counsel in opening statement
  • holding defense counsel’s opening statement “opened the door to the introduction of evidence rebutting the contention that [defendant] was merely an addict”
  • finding that where defense ‘opened the door’ by claiming that the defendant had no connection to the sale of drugs, the state was entitled to rebut that claim by delving into the defendant’s drug record
  • holding a criminal defendant's opening statement, which created the impression he had no prior connection to the sale of narcotics, opened the door to the introduction of evidence rebutting the contention that the defendant was merely an addict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pleicones, Toal, Moore, Waller, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.