Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2/24/2003
State v. Butler
Citations
- 577 S.E.2d 498
- 353 S.C. 383
- 2003 S.C. App. LEXIS 20
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that appellate review in Fourth Amendment search and seizure cases is \limited to determining whether any evidence supports the trial court's finding\ (quoting State v. Green, 341 S.C. 214, 219 n.3, 532 S.E.2d 896, 898 n.3 (Ct. App. 2000))
- discussing whether an officer had a reasonable suspicion to conduct a pat- down or frisk of a suspect reasonably believed to be armed
- \The stopping of a vehicle and the detention of its occupants constitutes a seizure and implicates the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures.\
- \The stopping of a vehicle and the detention of its occupants constitutes a seizure and implicates the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures.\
- adopting the Sakyi rule in this state
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goolsby, Huff, Shuler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-11-28· cited 69×
- State v. BandaSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-12-11· cited 38×
- State v. PageCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-04-03· cited 36×
- State v. HalcombCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-03-11· cited 22×
- State v. WillardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-05-31· cited 15×
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-02-15· cited 12×
- State v. YarboroughCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-01-31· cited 11×
- State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-11-02· cited 10×
- State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-07-22· cited 7×
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-03-20· cited 6×
- State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-03-13· cited 6×
- State v. PopeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-08-20· cited 6×
- State v. OdomCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-12-20· cited 2×
- State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-11-30· cited 2×
- State v. MuquitCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-01-12· cited 1×
- State v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2024-08-07
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 2,153×
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court· 1990-03-05· cited 2,122×
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 2,082×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 1,950×
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 1,555×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-23· cited 334×
- United States v. Norman Delano MooreFourth Circuit· 1987-05-05· cited 156×
- United States v. Collins Kusi SakyiFourth Circuit· 1998-10-30· cited 126×
- Smith v. United States Merit Systems Protection BoardSupreme Court· 1987-11-30· cited 75×
- State v. CopelandSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-03-25· cited 68×
- State v. BrockmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-02-22· cited 66×
- State v. BlassingameCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-12-06· cited 47×
- State v. KhingratsaiphonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-11-12· cited 44×
- State v. WoodruffCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-03-12· cited 25×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-01-05· cited 22×
- Sikes v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-09-06· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.