Supreme Court of Connecticut· 12/11/1990
State v. King
Citations
- 216 Conn. 585
- 583 A.2d 896
- 1990 Conn. LEXIS 418
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- new trial necessary where jury failed to make factual determination as to defendant’s mental state
- trial court must determine by in camera inspection on remand whether denial of access to report prepared by prosecution witness prejudiced defendant
- jury could not find defendant guilty on count of attempt to commit murder and guilty on count of assault in first degree because “statutory definitions of ‘intentionally’ and ‘recklessly’ are mutually exclusive and inconsistent”
- “the statutory definitions of ‘intentionally’ and ‘recklessly’ are mutually exclusive and inconsistent”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callahan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
101 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Purzycki v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-03-17· cited 195×
- State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-22· cited 166×
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-24· cited 156×
- State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-15· cited 114×
- State v. TweedySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-07-16· cited 109×
- State v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-03· cited 94×
- State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-03-05· cited 91×
- State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-04-16· cited 91×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-03-06· cited 89×
- Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. GalloConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-11-03· cited 83×
- State v. JolySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-06-18· cited 78×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-16· cited 76×
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-09· cited 59×
- State v. ColtherstSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-05-06· cited 50×
- State v. HarveyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-03-24· cited 41×
- State v. RumoreConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-07-28· cited 38×
- State v. FernandezConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-03-17· cited 37×
- State v. JOSE G.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-02-10· cited 36×
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-06-07· cited 36×
- State v. RadzvilowiczConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-09-30· cited 36×
Cites
68 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court· 1949-02-14· cited 1,180×
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1972-05-22· cited 1,080×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-06-05· cited 917×
- Walker v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1986-12-01· cited 387×
- State v. Kwan Fai MakWashington Supreme Court· 1986-04-24· cited 348×
- Goldberg v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-30· cited 328×
- Milanovich v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-03-20· cited 308×
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-30· cited 222×
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-06-19· cited 212×
- McManues v. OverbergSupreme Court· 1979-10-29· cited 210×
- William H. Fuller v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-03-03· cited 199×
- People v. LucasIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-12-21· cited 194×
- State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-12-17· cited 169×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-10· cited 165×
- People v. GallagherNew York Court of Appeals· 1987-05-07· cited 162×
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-10· cited 146×
- State v. SinclairSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-11-12· cited 145×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.