Skip to main content

State v. King

Citations

  • 216 Conn. 585
  • 583 A.2d 896
  • 1990 Conn. LEXIS 418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • new trial necessary where jury failed to make factual determination as to defendant’s mental state
  • trial court must determine by in camera inspection on remand whether denial of access to report prepared by prosecution witness prejudiced defendant
  • jury could not find defendant guilty on count of attempt to commit murder and guilty on count of assault in first degree because “statutory definitions of ‘intentionally’ and ‘recklessly’ are mutually exclusive and inconsistent”
  • “the statutory definitions of ‘intentionally’ and ‘recklessly’ are mutually exclusive and inconsistent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callahan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

101 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

68 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.