Supreme Court of Iowa· 6/18/1986

State v. Holland

Citations

389 N.W.2d 375
1986 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding officers’ warrantless search was a valid protective sweep because the arresting officers knew a gun had been stolen in the burglary and the defendant’s accomplice was still at large
holding the State failed to meet its burden of 4 showing a witness’s unavailability because “[t]he prosecutor should have subpoenaed the witness again for trial”
concluding officers’ assertions “that the Department of Human Services would be called to take charge 6 of the children left in the apartment” on defendant’s arrest “were not improper or in any way inaccurate”
noting the lack of evidence suggesting the consent was secured by threats or coercion because \[b]y the time [the consenter] consented to the search she had been told she was not under arrest and had no reason to believe she would again be taken into custody\
noting the lack of evidence suggesting the consent was secured by threats or coercion because “[b]y the time [the consenter] consented to the search she had been told she was not under arrest and had no reason to believe she would again be taken into custody”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGIVERIN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.