Robbins v. California
Citations
- 453 U.S. 420
- 101 S. Ct. 2841
- 69 L. Ed. 2d 744
- 1981 U.S. LEXIS 132
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- implying that police could also use statements of a suspect in deciding whether the contents of containers “ ‘could be inferred from their outward appearance.’ ”
- referring to the rule of the Sanders footnote as “little more than another variation of the plain view exception”
- exemplifying the dissimilar decisions throughout the country due to the refusal of later court opinions to follow its rationale
- exemplifying the dissimilar decisions throughout the country due to the refusal of later court opinions to follow its rationale
- listing cases decided by Federal Courts of Appeals since Chadwick had been announced
- listing cases decided by Federal Courts of Appeals since Chadwick had been announced
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blackmuzst, Stewart, Brennan, White, Marshall, Burger, Powell, Blackmun, Rehnquist, Stevens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
336 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,970×
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court· 2009-04-21· cited 2,725×
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 1,923×
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court· 1991-06-03· cited 1,409×
- Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,351×
- California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court· 1988-05-16· cited 1,059×
- United States v. KaroSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 895×
- Thornton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2004-05-24· cited 660×
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 519×
- People v. DamianoNew York Court of Appeals· 1996-01-16· cited 374×
- People v. BeltonNew York Court of Appeals· 1982-02-11· cited 293×
- United States v. Gaetano ModicaSecond Circuit· 1981-10-30· cited 288×
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-10-21· cited 275×
- People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-07-07· cited 263×
- State v. HempeleSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-07-17· cited 216×
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Natural Resources Defense CounNinth Circuit· 2014-03-13· cited 207×
Cites
64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 3,538×
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 2,561×
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 2,465×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-05· cited 1,768×
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-10-12· cited 1,597×
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-04-21· cited 1,585×
Other cases named Robbins v. California
5 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.