Supreme Court of Iowa· 6/18/1980

State v. Olsen

Citations

293 N.W.2d 216
1980 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding federal exigency requirement is met if the vehicle is mobile, its occupants alerted, and its contents at risk of disappearing if a warrant must be obtained
concluding federal exigency requirement is met if the vehicle is mobile, its occupants alerted, and its contents at risk of disappearing if a warrant must be obtained
concluding federal exigency requirement is met if the vehicle is mobile, its occupants alerted, and its contents at risk of disappearing if a warrant must be obtained
declining to apply more protective interpretation to search and seizure clause of state constitution than United States Supreme Court adopted for federal constitution
declining to apply more protective interpretation to search and seizure clause of state constitution than United States Supreme Court adopted for federal constitution
noting.exigency might exist for purposes of article I, section 8, if there is a risk the vehicle’s contents will disappear

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reynoldson, Rees, Harris, McCormick, All-Bee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.