Skip to main content

State v. Oliver

Citations

  • 341 N.W.2d 744
  • 1983 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1774

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding no error where any ambiguity in instruction was hypertechnical and speculative
  • holding no error where any ambiguity in instruction was hypertechnical and speculative
  • iciting Coolidge, 403 U.S. at 468-471, 91 S.Ct. at 2039-41, 29 L.Ed.2d at 584-86.
  • explaining the requirements to establish a plain view exception to search and seizure law
  • explaining the requirements to establish a plain view exception to search and seizure law
  • noting evidence may be seized under the plain view doctrine when the intrusion into the area is justified, the discovery of the object is inadvertent, and the incriminating nature of the object is immediately apparent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reynoldson, Uhlenhopp, McCormick, Schultz, Wolle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.