Supreme Court of Iowa· 5/23/1990

State v. Boley

Citations

456 N.W.2d 674
1990 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 139
1990 WL 69393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

describing a first-degree robbery conviction as a violation of sections 711.1 and 711.2 (1987)
affirming conviction where the evidence showed the defendant lacked and needed funds
“When state and federal constitutional sections encompass the same protections, we usually consider them identical in scope and purpose.”
“A conviction of robbery requires proof of the intent to commit a theft and not proof of the actual theft.”
“The jury could also infer that defendant’s failure to actually commit a theft was due to the unexpected arrival of another customer at the station and to the hidden cash register key.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Harris, Schultz, Carter, Lavorato

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.