Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of Iowa· 2/23/1994

State v. Chrisman

Citations

  • 514 N.W.2d 57
  • 1994 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 37
  • 1994 WL 54039

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where legislation reducing the punishment became effective after the crime was committed but before sentencing, the new legislation applied
  • holding that where legislation reducing the punishment for burglary became effective after the crime was committed but before sentencing, the new legislation applied
  • interpreting the effect of Iowa Code sec- tion 714.3 and determining whether the single-larceny rule still applies
  • interpreting the effect of Iowa Code sec- tion 714.3 and determining whether the single-larceny rule still applies
  • “The language of the statute shows that section 4.13 was intended to give a defendant who had not yet been sentenced the benefit of a reduced punishment enacted after the commission of the offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter, Larson, Lavorato, Neuman, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.