State v. Hershey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, in light of the errors in the BVA decision requiring remand, there was no need for the Court to address the appellant’s additional arguments
• noting that, in light of the errors in the BVA decision requiring remand, there was no 6 need for the Court to address the appellant's additional arguments
• finding error where, in analyzing whether appellant had engaged in combat, Board partly relied on lack of award of medals showing combat service but neglected to address, inter alia, appellant’s sworn testimony that he had engaged in combat
• finding error where, in analyzing whether appellant had engaged in combat, Board partly relied on lack of award of medals showing combat service but neglected to address, inter alia, appellant's sworn testimony that he had engaged in combat
• “determination as to whether a veteran was engaged in combat with the enemy is particularly significant in PTSD cases”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).