Skip to main content

State v. Newell

Citations

  • 710 N.W.2d 6
  • 2006 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 17
  • 2006 WL 305531

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \erroneously admitted hearsay will not be considered prejudicial if substantially the same evidence is properly in the record\
  • indicating appellate court can affirm evidentiary ruling on any ground raised on appeal
  • indicating appellate court can affirm evidentiary ruling on any ground raised on appeal
  • “Although we base our decision on a different rationale, we find no reversible error in the trial court’s ruling.”
  • “Although we base our decision on a different rationale, we find no reversible error in the trial court’s ruling.”
  • “Although we base our decision on a different rationale, we find no reversible error in the trial court’s ruling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ternus, Carter, Lavorato, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

207 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.