Michael Anthony Taylor v. Michael S. Bowersox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when there is no state court adjudication of a claim, we do not apply the AEDPA's deferential standard of review but review the district court's factual determinations for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo
• holding that when there is no state court adjudication of a claim, we need not apply the AEDPA's deferential standard of review but review the district court's factual determinations for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo
• finding that a lawyer who was fired from the public defender’s office and who allegedly had to devote time to finding a new job nevertheless provided defendant with adequate representation
• holding a claim for ineffective assistance of direct appeal counsel must initially be presented to state courts as an independent claim before it may be used to establish cause for a procedural default in a federal habeas proceeding
• holding exhaustion doctrine requires claim for ineffective assistance of direct appeal counsel be initially presented to state courts as an independent claim before it may be used to establish cause for a procedural default in federal habeas proceeding
• holding exhaustion doctrine requires claim for ineffective assistance of direct appeal counsel be initially presented to state courts as an independent claim before it may be used to establish cause for a procedural default in federal habeas proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).