Supreme Court of Kansas· 1/25/1989
State v. Norris
Citations
- 768 P.2d 296
- 244 Kan. 326
- 1989 Kan. LEXIS 29
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant's Fifth Amendment right to counsel terminates when he is released from custody
- claiming right to counsel does not bar later interrogation for an unrelated offense conducted after release from custody
- despite testimony that defendant had consumed half a case of beer and some whiskey before interrogation, defendant’s responses and behavior indicated he made a valid waiver of his rights
- defendant's claim of intoxication, physical and psychological pressure not supported by evidence; statement voluntarily given
- defendant’s Fifth Amendment right to counsel terminates when he is released from custody
- failure to include psychiatric records reviewed in camera precludes appellate review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Six
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Willie v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1991-07-24· cited 380×
- State v. FurloughCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1990-04-10· cited 112×
- State v. KygerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1989-09-27· cited 91×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-12-07· cited 82×
- State v. BetancourtSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-02-13· cited 77×
- State v. GillilandSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-05-11· cited 73×
- State v. ZamoraSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-12-14· cited 72×
- People v. StormCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-08-15· cited 68×
- People v. TrujilloSupreme Court of Colorado· 1989-05-30· cited 61×
- State v. WilliamSupreme Court of Kansas· 1991-03-01· cited 56×
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-01-22· cited 50×
- United States v. GrootersUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1994-06-08· cited 50×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-01-19· cited 36×
- State v. ConsaulCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-11-25· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. RainwaterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-07-24· cited 33×
- State v. BanksSupreme Court of Kansas· 1996-11-01· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. GalfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-08-13· cited 32×
- State v. HooksSupreme Court of Kansas· 1992-10-30· cited 18×
- State v. KeithSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-05-21· cited 17×
- State v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-08-10· cited 17×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court· 1986-04-01· cited 1,418×
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 963×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Miguel A. Espinoza v. J.W. Fairman, WardenSeventh Circuit· 1987-02-25· cited 105×
- United States v. Francis SkinnerNinth Circuit· 1982-02-18· cited 91×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-12-11· cited 57×
- State v. BrightSupreme Court of Kansas· 1981-01-27· cited 43×
- State v. NewfieldSupreme Court of Kansas· 1981-02-28· cited 42×
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Kansas· 1987-01-16· cited 36×
- United States v. William Frederick Geittmann, Jr. And David Robert Zamansky, DefendantsTenth Circuit· 1984-05-25· cited 35×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas· 1985-01-26· cited 33×
- State v. ShultzSupreme Court of Kansas· 1978-12-09· cited 29×
- State v. KaniveSupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-12-11· cited 29×
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1911-07-07· cited 26×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-03-06· cited 25×
- State v. BeebeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1988-12-09· cited 24×
- State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1980-02-08· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.