Supreme Court of Vermont· 5/21/1993
State v. Keith
Citations
- 628 A.2d 1247
- 160 Vt. 257
- 1993 Vt. LEXIS 62
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that twenty-month delay \far exceeds the length of delay needed to trigger a review of the other three factors\
- holding that twenty-month delay “far exceeds the length of delay needed to trigger a review of the other three factors”
- concluding that it was “unnecessary to examine the reasons for the delay” in holding that 20-month delay was sufficient “to trigger a review of the other three [Barker] factors”
- concluding that it was “unnecessary to examine the reasons for the delay” in holding that 20-month delay was sufficient “to trigger a review of the other three [ Barker ] factors”
- noting that speedy-trial violations are rare because \courts are reluctant to resort to the radical remedy of dismissal\ when it means freeing someone who may have committed serious crime
- noting that speedy-trial violations are rare because “courts are reluctant to resort to the radical remedy of dismissal” when it means freeing someone who may have committed serious crime
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BrillonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-03-14· cited 69×
- State v. CrannellSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-01-28· cited 37×
- State v. BrillonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-03-19· cited 30×
- State v. YoungNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-04-20· cited 26×
- State v. TurgeonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-03-08· cited 22×
- State v. MumleySupreme Court of Vermont· 2009-05-08· cited 18×
- State v. BeerSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-10-01· cited 12×
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Vermont· 2013-04-12· cited 10×
- In re YohVermont Superior Court· 2005-01-31
- State v. Michael A. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Vermont· 2024-02-16
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 2,172×
- State v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-01-13· cited 85×
- Commonwealth v. ShippsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-05-12· cited 52×
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-12-21· cited 50×
- State v. UsrySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-11-17· cited 49×
- State v. NorrisSupreme Court of Kansas· 1989-01-25· cited 48×
- William Flowers v. Warden, Connecticut Correctional Institution, SomersSecond Circuit· 1988-08-04· cited 42×
- State v. UnwinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1980-11-05· cited 41×
- State v. PercySupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-05-08· cited 41×
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-11-19· cited 36×
- State v. DeanSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-10-09· cited 29×
- State v. LyndsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-10-25· cited 28×
- State v. VenmanSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-04-14· cited 23×
- State v. MalinowskiSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-10-09· cited 23×
- State v. SnideSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-05-25· cited 21×
- State v. FrenchSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-06-30· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.