Skip to main content

State v. Adams

Citations

  • 85 Kan. 435
  • 116 P. 608
  • 1911 Kan. LEXIS 89

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Admissions — Voluntary Statements Admissible. • Statements made by one charged with murder to a county attorney and county commissioner, giving in detail the facts of the crime, are properly received in evidence when there is no showing that such statements were procured by duress, promise of reward, or other improper means.</p> <p>2. Evidence — Shoe-tracks Admissible. The description and measurement of tracks at the scene of the crime which correspond with the shoes worn by the defendant and introduced in evidence are competent.</p> <p>3. Bloodhounds.— When Conduct of Admissible as Evidence. Before evidence of the conduct of bloodhounds alleged to have been put upon the trail of the defendant can properly be received it should appear that the dogs in question were able, at the time and under the circumstances, to follow the scent or track of a person. When such foundation has been laid and the evidence showing the conduct of the dogs has been received, a charge in substance that before the jury can consider such conduct they must find that the dogs in question were accurate, certain and reliable in following the trail of human footsteps, and if they find from the evidence touching the matter that they were and are reliable and accurate in this regard then the evidence of their work and its result may be considered, together with all the other evidence in the case, as a circumstance determining the guilt of the defendant, is not prejudicially erroneous as to such defendant.</p> <p>4. - Weight of Such Evidence for Jury. While the competency of such evidence must be determined by the court before its admission and not left to the jury, still after its admission and after cross-examination or rebuttal it may become so weakened that the jury should disregard it.</p> <p>5. - When Conduct of Bloodhounds Should Not he Considered. If a proper foundation for such evidence be subsequently so weakened or destroyed as to render the jury unabl

Judges: Benson, Porter, West

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.