Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1/25/1984
State v. Smith
Citations
- 675 P.2d 510
- 66 Or. App. 703
- 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2489
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Holding that Breathalyzer certifications are admissible in criminal cases under OEC 803(8)(b) as public records and that the certifications do not stem from “the adversarial context of a particular case that might cloud law enforcement personnel’s perception.”
- stating that certificates of breathalyzer inspections relate to “the routine function of testing breathalyzer equipment to insure that it gives accurate readings”
- adopting the ministerial exception under OEC 803(8) and admitting breathalyzer records
- public records of routine ministerial and nonadversarial observations satisfies the public records and reports exception to hearsay rule in OEC 803(8
- public records of routine ministerial and nonadversarial observations satisfies the public records and reports exception to hearsay rule in OEC 803(8
- certificates of breathalyzer inspections relate to “the routine function of testing breathalyzer equipment to insure that it gives accurate readings”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Buttler, Warren, Rossman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. McClanahanIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-04-20· cited 118×
- State v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-12-07· cited 38×
- State v. HancockOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 36×
- State v. EdmondsOregon Supreme Court· 2019-02-28· cited 21×
- State v. ConwayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-11-14· cited 17×
- State v. OfaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1992-03-25· cited 16×
- Frady v. FradyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-12-04· cited 14×
- State v. DillinerWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2002-07-26· cited 11×
- Steiner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1997-09-26· cited 9×
- Bransford v. State Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-04-30· cited 8×
- State v. ScallyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-07-13· cited 8×
- State v. StonerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-01-29· cited 4×
- State v. Davis.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2017-05-15· cited 3×
- State v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-11-12· cited 3×
- State v. CantwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-02-01· cited 3×
- State v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-02-01· cited 2×
- State v. BigejCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-12-18· cited 1×
- State v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-13
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- University of Oregon Co-Operative Store v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court· 1975-11-20· cited 52×
- Karsun v. KelleyOregon Supreme Court· 1971-03-10· cited 35×
- Everts v. HoltmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-08-03· cited 21×
- State v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1969-12-18· cited 16×
- Santiam Fish & Game Ass'n v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court· 1962-01-17· cited 12×
- State v. CoffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1972-11-10· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.