Oregon Supreme Court· 7/11/2002

State v. Moore

Citations

49 P.3d 785
334 Or. 328
2002 Ore. LEXIS 433

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “[b]efore the state may introduce into evidence a witness’s out-of-court declarations against a criminal defendant, the state must produce the witness at trial or demonstrate that the witness is unavailable to testify”
providing overview of state and federal constitutional standards and setting out two-part test
officer “testified that, when he arrived at the scene, defendant was intoxicated”
officer ‘testified that, when he arrived at the scene, defendant was intoxicated’
“[T]his court has continued to apply [the two- part test from Ohio v. Roberts, 448 US 56, 100 S Ct 2531, 65 L Ed 2d 597 (1980)] when a defendant alleges that the admis- sion of hearsay violates his or her right to meet a witness face Cite as 300 Or App 1 (2019

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Durham, Leeson, Riggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.