State v. Nolen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, under Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution, officers must provide Miranda warnings to a suspect before interrogating them if the suspect is in “com- pelling circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rodriguez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-02-12· cited 6×
• State v. Pozos
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-08-28· cited 1×

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• State v. Walton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-04-04· cited 149×
• State v. Turnidge
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 129×
• State v. Roble-Baker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-05-25· cited 111×
• Shields v. Campbell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-01-27· cited 78×
• State v. Shaff
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-28· cited 66×
• State v. Veatch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-29· cited 41×
• State v. Heise-Fay
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-10-07· cited 25×
• State v. Quebrado
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2024-05-16· cited 21×
• State v. Soprych
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-16· cited 21×
• State v. Reed
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2023-10-19· cited 20×
• State v. Bush
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-01-04· cited 19×
• State v. Nelson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-05-10· cited 18×
• State v. Northcutt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-10-26· cited 17×
• State v. Grimm
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-14· cited 17×
• State v. Sprow
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-06-12· cited 12×
• State v. Courville
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-03-02· cited 11×
• State v. Swanson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-08-29· cited 10×
• State v. Stone
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-18· cited 9×
• State v. Machain
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-12-30· cited 8×
• State v. Revette
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-06· cited 8×