State v. Nelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “routine traffic stops” are not “sufficiently compelling to require Miranda warnings”
• observing that it is “routine” for an officer to ask a driver to remain in a vehi- cle during a traffic stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State ex rel City of Pendleton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-02-20· cited 10×
• State v. Gallegos-Torres
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-27· cited 6×
• State v. Nolen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-06-26· cited 3×
• State v. Crawford
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-06-17· cited 1×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• State v. Smith
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-05-10· cited 205×
• State v. Turnidge
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 129×
• State v. Carlson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-03-21· cited 127×
• State v. Roble-Baker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-05-25· cited 111×
• State v. Magee
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-10-20· cited 87×
• State v. Shaff
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-28· cited 66×
• State v. Scott
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-08-23· cited 45×
• State v. Prickett
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-01-16· cited 31×
• State v. Werowinski
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-02-13· cited 29×
• State v. Warner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-29· cited 28×
• State v. McMillan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-10-02· cited 24×
• State v. SCHWERBEL
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-01-27· cited 18×
• State v. Nevel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-02-09· cited 17×
• State v. Bevan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-06-09· cited 11×
• State v. Stone
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-18· cited 9×
• State v. Schwerbel
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-10-07· cited 7×