Skip to main content

State v. Swanson

Citations

  • 429 P.3d 732
  • 293 Or. App. 562

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to “express an opinion on whether, even if the right [to counsel] had not attached, the * * * testimony was nonetheless impermissible”
  • in reviewing the denial of a motion for mistrial, attaching “little significance to defendant’s decision not to propose a curative instruction”
  • “We will not find the denial of a mistrial to be an abuse of discretion unless the defendant was denied a fair trial.”
  • in reviewing the denial of a motion for mistrial, attaching “little significance to defendant’s decision not to propose a curative instruction”
  • “[I]t is the court, not defendant, that must decide whether to grant the motion, to cure the effect of inappropriate conduct or testimony by giving a proper instruction instead, or to do nothing at all.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
  • “[I]t is the court, not defendant, that must decide whether to grant the motion, to cure the effect of inappropriate conduct or testimony by giving a proper instruction instead, or to do nothing at all.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dehoog, Egan, James

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.