· 1/27/1977
Shields v. Campbell
Citations
- 559 P.2d 1275
- 277 Or. 71
- 1977 Ore. LEXIS 1053
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that guiding principle behind rules of preservation is “not merely to promote form over substance but to promote an efficient administration of justice”
- explaining that preservation does not “promote form over substance but [promotes] an efficient administration of justice and the sav- ing of judicial time”
- explaining that when a party “did not object, except or move to strike” a complained-of issue at trial, the matter was not preserved for appeal because “the trial court never had any opportunity to decide the issue or to correct any alleged error”
- explaining that when a party “did not object, except or move to strike” a complained-of issue at trial, the matter was not preserved for appeal because “the trial court never had any opportunity to decide the issue or to correct any alleged error”
- reason for requirement is not merely to promote form over substance but to promote efficient administration of justice and saving of judicial time
- upholding, under ORS 17.320, the trial court’s submission to the jury for use in its deliberations a copy of an appellate opinion, after the trial court had warned the plaintiffs counsel that “if the exhibit were received in evidence it would be subject to perusal by the jury”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Denecke, Holman, Howell, Lent, Linde, Mengler, Bradshaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.