Skip to main content

State v. Nguyen

Citations

  • 253 Conn. 639
  • 756 A.2d 833
  • 2000 Conn. LEXIS 219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in determining whether sequestration order was violated, trial court was entitled to credit defense counsel’s assertions and was not required to conduct evidentiary hearing
  • trial court was not required to conduct evidentiary hearing prior to barring witness’ testimony as sanction for violation of sequestration order given ‘‘effectively uncontested’’ rep- resentations by prosecutor and defense counsel, and defendant’s failure to request evidentiary hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Katz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.