Supreme Court of Connecticut· 6/25/1996
D'Ascanio v. D'Ascanio
Citations
- 237 Conn. 481
- 678 A.2d 469
- 1996 Conn. LEXIS 215
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that enforceability of a settlement terminating alimony in the event of cohabitation depends on whether court has approved agreement as fair and equitable
- determining that enforceability of a settlement terminating alimony in the event of cohabitation depends on whether court has approved agreement as fair and equitable
- evidence sufficient when defendant’s cohabitation resulted in contribution from cohabitant of $100 per week
- “[t]his court may reject a factual finding if it is clearly erroneous, in that as a matter of law it is unsupported by the record, incorrect, or otherwise mistaken” [internal quotation marks omitted]
- discussing standard under subsection [b] of § 46b-86
- trial court has “ ‘unique opportunity to view the evidence presented in a totality of circumstances, i.e., including its observations of the demeanor and conduct of the witnesses and parties, which is not fully reflected in the cold, printed record which is available to us’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Konzelman v. KonzelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-05-12· cited 167×
- State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-07-14· cited 99×
- State v. Michael J.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-07-05· cited 53×
- State v. NguyenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-07-18· cited 50×
- Somers v. ChanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-09-30· cited 42×
- Blum v. BlumConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-07-22· cited 40×
- D'Angelo v. McGoldrickSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-12-03· cited 38×
- Lucas v. LucasWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2003-12-05· cited 36×
- Gervais v. GervaisConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-10-11· cited 36×
- Doody v. DoodyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-02-13· cited 25×
- Benedetto v. WanatConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-09-02· cited 22×
- Spencer v. SpencerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2017-10-31· cited 10×
- DeMaria v. DeMariaConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-02-24· cited 9×
- Nation-Bailey v. BaileyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-07-23· cited 7×
- Konzelman v. KonzelmanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-01-16· cited 6×
- Gorton v. GortonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-10-21· cited 3×
- Boreen v. BoreenConnecticut Appellate Court· 2019-09-03· cited 1×
- Nation-Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-04-21
- Grimes v. GrimesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-05-20
- Fazio v. FazioConnecticut Appellate Court· 2016-01-05
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-03-02· cited 139×
- Fleming v. GarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-23· cited 109×
- Sands v. SandsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-08-17· cited 59×
- Hayes v. BeresfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-07-07· cited 51×
- Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-07-21· cited 50×
- Lupien v. LupienSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-03-13· cited 46×
- Mihalyak v. MihalyakConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-03-02· cited 33×
- Duhl v. DuhlConnecticut Appellate Court· 1986-04-15· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.