Skip to main content

State v. Falby

Citations

  • 187 Conn. 6
  • 444 A.2d 213
  • 1982 Conn. LEXIS 499

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • giving state’s expert transcript of testimony of defendant’s expert testimony, in violation of sequestration order, was harmful
  • \[t]he obvious purpose of sequestering a witness while another is giving his testimony is to prevent the one sequestered from shaping his testimony to corroborate falsely the testimony of the other\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • “[t]he obvious purpose of sequestering a witness while another is giving his testimony is to prevent the one sequestered from shaping his testimony to corroborate falsely the testimony of the other” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • “ ‘[t]he obvious purpose of sequestering a witness while another is giving his testimony is to prevent the one sequestered from shaping his testimony to corroborate falsely the testimony of the other’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Petees, Speziale, Peters, Healey, Armentano, Shea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

113 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.