Connecticut Appellate Court· 7/11/1995
State v. Sherman
Citations
- 38 Conn. App. 371
- 662 A.2d 767
- 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 327
- 1995 WL 411224
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that Frye did not apply to expert testimony on time of death based on generally accepted principles of pathology and general expertise in field of pathology
- finding sequestration violation based on counsel’s representation that expert had been furnished with transcript of prior witness’ testimony
- “Connecticut courts utilize the Frye standard in appraising the admissibility of evidence derived from innovative scientific techniques” [internal quotation marks omitted]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-20· cited 268×
- State v. WhipperSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-10-02· cited 89×
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-15· cited 86×
- State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-12-26· cited 67×
- State v. NguyenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-07-18· cited 50×
- Jenkins v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-03-23· cited 39×
- State v. CrumpConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-09-24· cited 27×
- State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-04-30· cited 26×
- State v. AponteConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-08-25· cited 24×
- State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-07-03· cited 23×
- State v. RiveraConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-02-13· cited 23×
- State v. Hoa Van NguyenConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-03-02· cited 22×
- Hayes v. DeckerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-03· cited 21×
- State v. ClarkConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-06-02· cited 20×
- State v. RogersConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-09-22· cited 20×
- State v. KenneyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-05-18· cited 17×
- State v. LepriConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-01-18· cited 17×
- State v. PounceyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-03-19· cited 16×
- State v. SinchakConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-11-11· cited 16×
- State v. DowningConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-02-26· cited 16×
Cites
102 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1935-04-15· cited 4,581×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1986-09-03· cited 4,161×
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 3,922×
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 3,512×
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-05-28· cited 668×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-28· cited 498×
- People v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-03-11· cited 314×
- Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1960-11-15· cited 311×
- United States v. Gaetano ModicaSecond Circuit· 1981-10-30· cited 288×
- State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-07-17· cited 255×
- Charles Silagy, Cross-Appellant v. Howard Peters, Iii, Warden, Pontiac Correctional Center, Cross-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1990-07-10· cited 214×
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-06-19· cited 212×
- McManues v. OverbergSupreme Court· 1979-10-29· cited 210×
- State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-10-02· cited 199×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-10· cited 165×
- United States v. Hayward Leslie BrownSixth Circuit· 1977-08-16· cited 158×
- Summerville v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-05-24· cited 148×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.