Skip to main content

State v. Sherman

Citations

  • 38 Conn. App. 371
  • 662 A.2d 767
  • 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 327
  • 1995 WL 411224

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Frye did not apply to expert testimony on time of death based on generally accepted principles of pathology and general expertise in field of pathology
  • finding sequestration violation based on counsel’s representation that expert had been furnished with transcript of prior witness’ testimony
  • “Connecticut courts utilize the Frye standard in appraising the admissibility of evidence derived from innovative scientific techniques” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

102 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.