Skip to main content

State v. Newman

Citations

  • 680 P.2d 257
  • 235 Kan. 29
  • 1984 Kan. LEXIS 311

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding district court erred in excluding State's proffered 12 evidence based on fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine where there was no unlawful police conduct
  • holding the statutory marital privilege under K.S.A. 60-423(b) and K.S.A. 60-428(a
  • holding the statutory marital privilege under K.S.A. 60-423(b) and K.S.A. 60-428(a
  • interpreting K.S.A. 22-3603 to permit interlocutory appeals of evidentiary rulings that \substantially impair the state's ability to prosecute the case\
  • noting suppression must substantially impair the State's case to pursue interlocutory appeal
  • noting suppression must substantially impair the State's case to pursue interlocutory appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prager

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.