Nebraska Supreme Court· 8/17/2018

State v. Newman

Citations

300 Neb. 770
916 N.W.2d 393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding no evidentiary hearing is required in postconviction proceeding when records and files affirmatively refute defendant’s claim
allegations of ineffectiveness are too speculative to require evidentiary hearing if petitioner fails to allege what exculpatory evidence would have been found
defendant’s “allegation of failure to cross-examine a witness on a minor credibility issue is not sufficient to demonstrate either deficient performance or resulting prejudice”
defendant’s allegation of failure to cross- examine witness on minor credibility issue is not sufficient to demonstrate either deficient performance or resulting preju- dice
assignment of error raised for first time in reply brief is untimely and will not be considered by court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, Papik, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Newman

187 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.