Illinois Supreme Court· 10/17/1980

People v. Young

Citations

412 N.E.2d 501
82 Ill. 2d 234
45 Ill. Dec. 150
1980 Ill. LEXIS 413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing the necessity to permit the interlocutory review of suppression orders and also that those interlocutory appeals should not be allowed where they would unnecessarily prolong the trial
recognizing the necessity to permit the interlocutory review of suppression orders and also that those interlocutory appeals should not be allowed where they would unnecessarily prolong the trial
recognizing the necessity to permit the interlocutory review of suppression orders and also that those interlocutory appeals should not be allowed where they would unnecessarily prolong the trial
Rule 604(a)(1) allows State appeals from a pretrial suppression order upon certification that the order substantially impairs its ability to prosecute a case
Rule 604(a)(1) is subject to the limitations of the double jeopardy clauses
“[s]ociety also has a broader, secondary interest in the coherent development of the law. *** The denial of review in a particular case may thus affect not only the ability of the State to prosecute a particular case but also its ability to prosecute similar cases in the future”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Underwood, Moran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

109 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.