Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/22/2018

State v. Jimenez

Citations

420 P.3d 464

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

determining that, under Rodriguez, travel plan questioning is only permissible if it does not extend the stop and requires a case-by-case evaluation
upholding suppression of drug-trafficking evidence discovered during a traffic stop that was improperly prolonged without reasonable suspicion
questioning driver about recent activities unrelated to the justification for the traffic stop is unconstitutional unless there is a reasonable suspicion of or probable cause to believe there is other criminal activity, or consent
follow- ing Rodriguez to affirm suppression of evidence from stop pro- longed by questions about travel plans unrelated to grounds for stop
no de minimis exception exists and an extension for any length of time is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment when it is based on anything but the articulated reason for the stop
\[A]ny traffic stop extension without reasonable suspicion or consent—by even a de minimis length of time—amounts to an unreasonable seizure when the delay is based on anything but the articulated components of the stop's mission.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.