Skip to main content
· 10/25/1985

State v. Huninghake

Citations

  • 708 P.2d 529
  • 238 Kan. 155
  • 1985 Kan. LEXIS 471

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suppression of blood alcohol test, given the statutory presumption of intoxication based on the test, substantially impaired State’s ability to prosecute DUI case
  • suppression of blood alcohol test, given the statutory presumption of intoxication based on the test, substantially impaired State’s ability to prosecute DUI case
  • suppression of blood alcohol test, given the statutory presumption of intoxication based on the test, substantially impaired State’s ability to prosecute DUI case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.