State v. O'BREMSKI

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that several courts have held the testimony of a witness discovered as a result of an illegal search is not admissible, but determining that the witness there could testify because knowledge of her came from an independent source
• noting that several courts have held the testimony of a witness discovered as a result of an illegal search is not admissible, but determining that the witness there could testify because knowledge of her came from an independent source
• \We have consistently adhered to the exclusionary rule expounded by the United States Supreme Court and have likewise embraced the `fruit of the poison tree' doctrine....\
• “We have consistently adhered to the exclusionary rule expounded by the United States Supreme Court and have likewise embraced the ‘fruit of the poison tree’ doctrine ....”
• existence and identity of witness known prior to illegally entering defendant’s apartment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).