State v. McMillan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in an arrest for prostitution, an officer confronted defendant with his observations of possible sexual activity and the prostitute’s statements that she had sex with defendant for money
• officer’s actions of preventing defendant from using his cell phone would have reasonably suggested to defendant that “the officers could exert control over his means of communication”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Heise-Fay
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-10-07· cited 25×
• State v. Bush
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-01-04· cited 19×
• State v. Nelson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-05-10· cited 18×
• State v. Breazile
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-08-06· cited 9×
• State v. Stone
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-18· cited 9×
• State v. Gallegos-Torres
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-27· cited 6×
• State v. Burdick
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-02-19· cited 4×
• State v. Olivar
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-11-07· cited 4×
• State v. Shirley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-02· cited 2×
• State v. Pusztai
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-02-03· cited 1×
• State v. Myers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-29· cited 1×
• State v. Crawford
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-06-17· cited 1×
• State of New Hampshire v. Dominic Carrier
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2020-04-07