Skip to main content
· 4/9/2002

Brizendine v. Conrad

Citations

  • 71 S.W.3d 587
  • 2002 Mo. LEXIS 51
  • 2002 WL 523534

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “an argument not set out in the point relied on but merely referred to in the argument portion of the brief . . . is considered abandoned” and similarly declining to give plain-error review to such an argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Laura Denvir Stith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.