Skip to main content
· 2/3/2015

State of Missouri v. David Russell Hosier

Citations

  • 454 S.W.3d 883
  • 2015 Mo. LEXIS 12
  • 2015 WL 500910

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding evidence of the “methodology of flight” is “probative as to the quality and depth of this consciousness” of guilt (alteration omitted)
  • holding, when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, that the Court “does not reweigh the evidence but, rather, considers it in the light most favorable to the verdict and grants the state all reasonable inferences”
  • “Whether testimony violates the confrontation clause is a question of law this Court reviews de novo.”
  • “numerous other weapons that were found in Defendant’s apartment and storage shed were introduced at trial, eliminating any prejudicial value of the weapons from his car”
  • photos of 14 weapons and unspent ammunition found in car defendant used to flee murder scene, but that were not used during crime, directly connected to defendant and the charged crime
  • fourteen guns and ammunition that were not alleged to have been used to commit the murder were logically relevant because they were found in defendant’s car during his flight from Jefferson City directly after the murders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chief Justice Mary R. Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.