Supreme Court of Missouri· 6/25/2013

State v. Jeffrey

Citations

400 S.W.3d 303
2013 WL 3192011
2013 Mo. LEXIS 36

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that overbreadth challenges are limited to cases involving the First Amendment
holding that a man standing naked in his front doorway or front window is “a situation in which one would not ordinarily expect to be confronted by nudity” and a situation which would cause a child affront or alarm
a party raising a facial challenge must show there is \no set of circumstances ... under which the [challenged law] may be constitutionally applied\
“Generally, to prevail in a facial challenge, the party challenging the statute must demonstrate that no set of circumstances exists under which the statute may be constitutionally applied.”
“Generally, to prevail in a facial challenge, the party challenging the statute must demonstrate that no set of circumstances exists under which the statute may be constitutionally applied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fischer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.