Skip to main content
· 8/3/2010

School District of Kansas City v. State

Citations

  • 317 S.W.3d 599
  • 2010 Mo. LEXIS 193
  • 2010 WL 3279769

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that proof of an “unfunded mandate” requires “specific proof of new or increased duties and increased expenses, and these elements cannot be established by mere common sense, or speculation and conjecture” (internal quotations omitted)
  • noting constitutional construction is “broad and liberal rather than technical”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Laura Denvir Stith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.