Texas Supreme Court· 1/12/1994

State v. Morales

Citations

869 S.W.2d 941
37 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 390
1994 Tex. LEXIS 17
1994 WL 6714

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that “[a]n injunction will not issue unless it is shown that the respondent will engage in the activity [to be] enjoined”
holding that equity court could not declare criminal statute unconstitutional and enjoin its enforcement
holding that trial court exercising equitable jurisdiction in civil declaratory judgment action did not have jurisdiction to declare penal code section unconstitutional
holding that an injunction will not issue unless it is shown that defendant will engage in activity enjoined
holding that equity court could not declare criminal statute unconstitutional and enjoin its enforcement
holding that equity court could not declare criminal statute unconstitutional and enjoin its enforcement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cornyn, Gammage, Gonzalez, Hightower, Hecht, Enoch, Phillips, Doggett, Spector

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

311 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Morales

185 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.