Arizona Supreme Court· 12/8/2009
State v. Allen
Citations
- 220 P.3d 245
- 223 Ariz. 125
- 571 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 10
- 2009 Ariz. LEXIS 264
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “stipulations do not bind the jury, and jurors may accept or reject them”
- acknowledging that a defendant waives several constitutional rights when pleading guilty
- “Although stipulations may bind the parties and relieve them of the burden of establishing the stipulated facts, stipulations do not bind the jury, and jurors may accept or reject them.”
- “Although stipulations may bind the parties and relieve them of the burden of establishing the stipulated facts, stipulations do not bind the jury, and jurors may accept or reject them.”
- “[S]tipulations do not bind the jury, and jurors may accept or reject them.”
- “Parties routinely stipulate to easily proven facts, and courts encourage such stipulations[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berch, Hurwitz, Ryan, Bales, Pelander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Arizona v. Edward James RoseArizona Supreme Court· 2013-04-04· cited 50×
- State of Arizona v. Aaron Brian GunchesArizona Supreme Court· 2016-09-01· cited 11×
- State v. Hon. hancock/jennifer FerrellArizona Supreme Court· 2015-04-07· cited 10×
- State of Arizona v. Craig A. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-02-03· cited 9×
- Smith v. BeesleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-01-12· cited 5×
- State v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-01-25
- In Re Pima County Mental Health Case No. Mh20200860Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2022-02-03
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1927-05-16· cited 1,174×
- Florida v. NixonSupreme Court· 2004-12-13· cited 963×
- State v. SpreitzArizona Supreme Court· 2002-01-30· cited 224×
- David L. Adams v. R.S. Peterson, Superintendent of O.S.C.I.Ninth Circuit· 1992-06-24· cited 145×
- State v. RodriguezArizona Supreme Court· 1998-07-14· cited 123×
- State v. WestArizona Supreme Court· 1993-09-30· cited 113×
- State v. CarreonArizona Supreme Court· 2005-02-24· cited 79×
- State v. MoralesArizona Supreme Court· 2007-05-08· cited 56×
- United States v. John Craige TerrackNinth Circuit· 1975-04-16· cited 53×
- State v. AvilaArizona Supreme Court· 1980-09-17· cited 41×
- State v. CrowleyArizona Supreme Court· 1974-12-04· cited 39×
- State v. WoodsArizona Supreme Court· 1977-02-22· cited 28×
- State v. GainesArizona Supreme Court· 1976-04-28· cited 25×
- State v. VirgoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-10-30· cited 24×
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-06-01· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.