Court of Appeals of Washington· 4/24/2006

State v. Saunders

Citations

132 P.3d 743

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“ ‘substantial pain’ ” in third degree assault statute not unconstitutionally vague (emphasis added)
\ substantial pain\ in third degree assault statute not unconstitutionally vague (emphasis added)
“ ‘substantial pain’ ” in third degree assault statute not unconstitutionally vague (emphasis added)
the victim suffered substantial pain and considerable suffering with “neck pain lasting for more than three hours, . . . swelling on her cheek and an abrasion on her forehead”
rational trier of fact could conclude that facial swelling and an abrasion, together with neck pain lasting for more than three hours, constituted substantial pain extending for a period sufficient to cause considerable suffering
rational trier of fact could conclude that facial swelling and an abrasion, together with neck pain lasting for more than three hours, constituted substantial pain extending for a period sufficient to cause considerable suffering

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Becker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.