Skip to main content

State v. Herrera

Citations

  • 594 P.2d 823
  • 286 Or. 349
  • 1979 Ore. LEXIS 746

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying standard in context of submission of defense to jury in criminal case
  • so stating, in context of submission of defense to jury in criminal case
  • “Before a prosecutor can use prior recorded testimony and thus deprive a defendant of his right at trial to confront his accusers face to face, he must first show the trial court that use of the former testimony is a genuine necessity.”
  • “Before a prosecutor can use prior recorded testimony and thus deprive a defendant of his right at trial to confront his accusers face to face, he must first show the trial court that use of the former testimony is a genuine necessity”
  • right of confrontation is not absolute
  • right of confrontation is not absolute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lent

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.