Oregon Supreme Court· 5/8/1979
State v. Herrera
Citations
- 594 P.2d 823
- 286 Or. 349
- 1979 Ore. LEXIS 746
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying standard in context of submission of defense to jury in criminal case
- so stating, in context of submission of defense to jury in criminal case
- “Before a prosecutor can use prior recorded testimony and thus deprive a defendant of his right at trial to confront his accusers face to face, he must first show the trial court that use of the former testimony is a genuine necessity.”
- “Before a prosecutor can use prior recorded testimony and thus deprive a defendant of his right at trial to confront his accusers face to face, he must first show the trial court that use of the former testimony is a genuine necessity”
- right of confrontation is not absolute
- right of confrontation is not absolute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lent
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Charles Harvey Joseph Franklin v. Dan Johnson, SuperintendentNinth Circuit· 2002-05-30· cited 312×
- Delgado v. SoudersOregon Supreme Court· 2002-05-16· cited 82×
- State v. LeClairCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-12-17· cited 55×
- State v. KitzmanOregon Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 42×
- State v. HancockOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 36×
- State v. MooreOregon Supreme Court· 2002-07-11· cited 32×
- State v. FarberOregon Supreme Court· 1983-06-29· cited 31×
- State v. WardOregon Supreme Court· 2020-10-29· cited 30×
- State v. WattenbargerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-07-05· cited 14×
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-03-17· cited 11×
- State v. BeldenOregon Supreme Court· 2021-12-02· cited 11×
- State v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-02-08· cited 9×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-12-15· cited 8×
- People v. McIntoshMichigan Court of Appeals· 1985-05-06· cited 8×
- State v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-07· cited 7×
- State v. GallupCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-09-06· cited 5×
- State v. HannaganSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1984-03-27· cited 5×
- State v. HarrisDeschutes County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-07-20· cited 5×
- State v. BenderCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-06-08· cited 4×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-08-04· cited 4×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court· 1968-04-29· cited 1,846×
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1879-01-18· cited 1,827×
- Motes v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1900-05-28· cited 321×
- State v. JonesOregon Supreme Court· 1977-07-11· cited 70×
- State v. SmythOregon Supreme Court· 1979-05-01· cited 51×
- State v. OsborneOregon Supreme Court· 1909-07-20· cited 49×
- State v. RawlsOregon Supreme Court· 1969-02-26· cited 25×
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court· 1971-11-24· cited 20×
- Carter v. MoteOregon Supreme Court· 1979-02-21· cited 19×
- State v. HerreraCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-02-07· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.